OPINIONS ARE POSTED DAILY BETWEEN 10:00 and 11:00 a.m.Current Opinions are for Monday, April 22, 2019 DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court. 182776P.pdf 04/22/2019 Dina Klein v. Credico Inc. U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-2776 U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Benton and Grasz, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Use of an abbreviation for defendant's other registered name and the phrase "Professional Debt Collectors" in correspondence was not false, misleading or deceptive and plaintiff failed to plead sufficient factual matter to state a plausible claim defendant violated the Act; inclusion of a non-licensed signatory in the signature block did not violate the Act as the other two signatories were licensed, as was defendant; the district court properly concluded Minnesota law does not prohibit defendant from seeking pre-judgment interest. 182805U.pdf 04/22/2019 United States v. Jose Corio-Raymundo U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-2805 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids [UNPUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Loken, Gruender and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for using a forged identification document as evidence of authorized employment and of misusing for tax purposes a social security number not assigned to him; within-Guidelines sentence was not substantively unreasonable.