DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

081593P.pdf   09/09/2009  Horizon Asset Management  v.  H&R Block, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  08-1593
                          and No:  08-1670
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Bowman and Riley, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Securities. After evaluating all of Horizon's allegations with respect to the false statements allegedly made by Block's Chairman and its Chief Financial Officer, the court concludes that the district court did not err in dismissing Horizon's claims against them as Horizon failed to raise a strong inference that the men made any of the statements with the scienter required to state a private securities fraud claim; Horizon also failed to plead scienter adequately with respect to Block or the individual defendants; because Horizon's control-person claims under section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must be predicated on some underlying violation, Horizon also failed to state a claim under section 20(a); while the district court's consolidation of nine securities and derivative actions against Block under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a) was not an abuse of discretion, the court's decision to appoint Horizon as the lead plaintiff for all of the claims, including the derivative claims asserted by the Iron Workers Local, was erroneous, as the court erred in determining the claims were not derivative claims and the Local showed that Horizon would not pursue the claims; on remand, the separate complaints filed by the Local and by Momentum Partners should be reinstated.