DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
081593P.pdf 09/09/2009 Horizon Asset Management v. H&R Block, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 08-1593
and No: 08-1670
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Bowman and Riley, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Securities. After evaluating all of Horizon's allegations
with respect to the false statements allegedly made by Block's Chairman
and its Chief Financial Officer, the court concludes that the district court
did not err in dismissing Horizon's claims against them as Horizon failed
to raise a strong inference that the men made any of the statements with
the scienter required to state a private securities fraud claim; Horizon also
failed to plead scienter adequately with respect to Block or the individual
defendants; because Horizon's control-person claims under section 20(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 must be predicated on some
underlying violation, Horizon also failed to state a claim under section
20(a); while the district court's consolidation of nine securities and
derivative actions against Block under Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a) was not an
abuse of discretion, the court's decision to appoint Horizon as the lead
plaintiff for all of the claims, including the derivative claims asserted by
the Iron Workers Local, was erroneous, as the court erred in determining
the claims were not derivative claims and the Local showed that Horizon
would not pursue the claims; on remand, the separate complaints filed by
the Local and by Momentum Partners should be reinstated.