DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
123062P.pdf 05/15/2014 Phillip Armstrong v. Berco Resources, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-3062
U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Kelly, Circuit
Judge]
Civil case - contracts. The district court did not err in concluding that
the purchase agreement and assignment, taken together, transferred a
wellbore-only interest to plaintiff rather than a leasehold interest in
the property on which the two wells were located; while the agreements
were ambiguous, the testimony the court heard regarding the parties'
intent, as well as custom and useage in the oil and gas industry,
supported the district court's conclusion; as plaintiff had only an
interest in the wellbores and did not allege that defendant interfered
with his use of them, the court did not err in dismissing his trespass
claim; since plaintiff did not have a leasehold interest, he failed to
satisfy a condition precedent in an agreement with defendant Encore, and
the court did not err in finding for Encore on plaintiff's claim for
breach of contract; it is undisputed that plaintiff altered the assignment
he recorded without obtaining the grantor's signature and acknowledgment,
and the deed was null and void under North Dakota law.