DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
151890P.pdf 07/06/2016 United States v. Austin DeCoster
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 15-1890
and No: 15-1891
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge
[PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Beam and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. In a prosecution for
violating 21 U.S.C. Sec. 331(a) for introducing eggs that had been
adulterated with salmonella into interstate commerce, the court rejects
defendants' Due Process Clause and Eighth Amendment constitutional
challenges; the penalty for defendants' violation was relatively small -
three months - and did not violate due process; both the language of the
statute and relevant Supreme Court precedent support the conclusion that
defendants are not required to know they violated the Act to be subject to
statutory penalties; the sentences are not grossly disproportionate to the
offense and do not violate the Eighth Amendment; the district court did
not commit any procedural error in setting the sentences, and the
sentences imposed were not substantially unreasonable. Judge Gruender,
concurring. Judge Beam, dissenting.