163646P.pdf   03/08/2019  United States  v.  LNG Express, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3646
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Chief Judge Smith, Wollman, Loken, 
   Gruender, Benton, Shepherd, Kelly , Erickson, Grasz, and Stras, Circuit 
   Judges, en banc] 
   Civil Case - forfeiture. In civil forfeiture proceedings, the specificity 
   pleading requirement for the statement of a claimant's interest in 
   property, set forth in United States v. $154,853.00, 744 F.3d 559, 562-63 
   (8th Cir. 2014) is overruled, as it is not supported by Rule G(5) of the 
   Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture 
   Actions. The district court's dismiss of the order striking the claim is 
   reversed. 
  
163646P.pdf   01/10/2018  United States  v.  LNG Express, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  16-3646
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Colloton and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Forfeiture. The district court did not abuse its discretion 
   by striking LNG's claim for seized currency as the claim failed to meet 
   the threshold pleading requirement set out in Rule G(5) of the 
   Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture 
   Actions. See United States v. $154,853 in U.S. Currency, 744 F.3d 559 (8th 
   Cir. 2014).