DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
173783P.pdf 06/13/2019 Federal Trade Commission v. Sanford Health
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 17-3783
U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Bismarck
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Shepherd and Stras, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Clayton Act. Action by the FTC and the State of North Dakota
to enjoin defendant Sanford's acquisition of Mid Dakota Clinic. The
district court granted a preliminary injunction after determining
plaintiffs would likely succeed in showing the acquisition would
substantially lessen competition in four types of physician services in
the Bismarck-Mandan area. The district court did not improperly shift the
burden of persuasion to defendants and correctly followed the burden
shifting framework endorsed by the D.C. Circuit in U.S. v. Baker Hughes,
Inc., 908 F.ed 981 (D.C. Cir. 1990); no error in determining the relevant
market; the court correctly determined the government had made a prima
facie case that the merger would result in an undue market concentration
in the relevant area.