DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

181846P.pdf   07/29/2019  Alexis Bailly Vineyard, Inc.  v.  John Harrington
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-1846
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kobes, Author, with Shepherd and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Minnesota Farm Wineries Act. The district court erred in 
   determining plaintiffs, Minnesota wineries, did not have standing to bring 
   a pre-enforcement challenge to the Minnesota Farm Wineries Act - Minn. 
   Stat. Sections 340A.201, 304A.401, requiring them to manufacture their 
   wine with a majority of the ingredients grown or produced in Minnesota; 
   the plaintiffs are the object of the Act and subject to future enforcement 
   actions brought by the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public 
   Safety and thus have standing to challenge the Act's constitutionality; 
   plaintiffs have injuries traceable to the in-state requirement and their 
   injury can be redressed by a declaratory judgment.