DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
182958P.pdf 01/08/2020 United States v. Antonio Outlaw
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 18-2958
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Kobes, Circuit Judges]
Criminal Case Criminal Law and Sentence. Outlaw pleaded guilty to
distributing heroin and a jury convicted him of conspiring to distribute
heroin and aiding and abetting. On appeal, Outlaw challenges the
sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdicts. Ample evidence
was presented that Outlaw knowingly and intentionally joined a conspiracy
to distribute heroin; based on the evidence supporting aiding and abetting
charge, a jury reasonably could have inferred that Outlaw knew in advance
that he was driving to a drug transaction and intentionally facilitated
his associate's transfer of heroin. The district court did not clearly err
in applying the four-level increase for an aggravating role in the offense
under Guidelines sec. 3B1.1(a), or the two-level increase for obstruction
of justice under Guidlines sec. 3C1.1, as there was sufficient evidence to
support the court's finding. The sentence within the advisory range was
reasonable.