DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

183422P.pdf   06/26/2020  John Davis  v.  Andrew Saul
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  18-3422
                          and No:  18-3451
                          and No:  18-3452
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Social Security. Appellants, unsuccessful applicants for 
   social security benefits in 2013 or 2014, brought actions in the district 
   court contending the ALJs who denied their applications for benefits wwer 
   not properly appointed in accordance with the Appointments Clause of the 
   Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 2, cl. 2; none of the claimants raised this 
   argument during the proceedings before the Social Security Administration, 
   and the district court ruled that the claimants waived the argument by 
   failing to raise it before the agency. Held: the district court properly 
   declined to consider the issue; this is not one of the rare situations in 
   which a federal court should consider an issue not presented to the 
   agency.