191584P.pdf   08/12/2020  United States  v.  Gregory Bartunek
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1584
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. In a prosecution for possession and 
   distribution of child pornography, the district court did not err in 
   permitting the government to introduce photos of child-size sex dolls 
   found in defendant's bedroom as the evidence was admissible under Rule 
   404(b) because it was relevant to rebut defendant's defense that someone 
   else had used his internet service to download the pornography and to 
   establish motive; no error in permitting the government to call a witness 
   who, as a minor, had viewed child pornography with defendant as the 
   testimony was admissible under Rule 414 to show defendant's sexual 
   interest in underage children; testimony from an investigator that he 
   received a tip in 2013 that defendant possessed child pornography, that he 
   went to defendant's home and while there saw a traffic cone in the 
   driveway labeled "CHIMO" was not so prejudicial as to require a mistrial, 
   as the court gave a limiting instruction that the line of testimony was 
   not evidence of a crime, and the reference to CHIMO (child molester) was 
   isolated and without explanation of its meaning or other comment; in any 
   event, the evidence of defendant's guilt was extensive.