191594P.pdf   08/28/2020  John Doe  v.  University of St. Thomas
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1594
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kobes, Author, with Gruender and Wollman, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case. On student's claim that the school's disciplinary proceedings 
   on allegations of sexual misconduct were conducted negligently and in 
   violation of the school's state law duty of care, the district court did 
   not err in granting the school's motion for summary judgment; while the 
   district court erred in rejecting an applicable Minnesota Court of Appeals 
   decision on the level of care which must be shown (arbitrariness), even 
   applying the more permissive reasonable care standard the court used in 
   granting the school summary judgment, no reasonable jury would find the 
   investigators' actions showed biased against plaintiff.