191842P.pdf   09/04/2020  John Doe  v.  University of AR- Fayetteville
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-1842
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville   
   [PUBLISHED] Colloton, Author, with Shepherd and Erickson, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Title IX. Doe stated a claim that the University 
   discriminated against him on the basis of sex, and the district court 
   erred in dismissing his Title IX claim; first, the complaint sufficiently 
   alleged that the hearing panel which disciplined Doe reached an outcome 
   that was against the weight of the evidence; second, the panel's chosen 
   sanctions are allegedly contrary to the ordinary disposition in cases of 
   sexual assault by force; third, Doe alleged the University was under 
   pressure on multiple fronts to find males responsible for sexual assaults; 
   these circumstances, taken together, are sufficient to support a plausible 
   claim that the University discriminated against Doe on the basis of sex; 
   Does has not stated a claim under the Due Process Clause against the 
   officials in their official or individual capacities, and those claims 
   were properly dismissed.