192139P.pdf   10/14/2020  United States  v.  Tony Reed
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  19-2139
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kobes, Author, with Gruender and Wollman, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. The district court did not 
   err in denying defendant's motion to suppress cell site location 
   information obtained under the Stored Communications Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 
   2703(d) because at the time law enforcement officers obtained the 
   information the Supreme Court has not yet decided Carpenter v. United 
   States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018, holding court orders under Sec. 2703(d) 
   violated the Fourth Amendment, and the officers acted in reasonable 
   reliance on the statute as it was not obviously unconstitutional when they 
   sought the order; the evidence was, therefore admissible under the good 
   faith exception to the exclusionary rule; no error in admitting evidence 
   of uncharged robberies as the evidence about them revealed pattern and 
   routine that helped explain how defendant committed the charged robberies; 
   evidence of an uncharged Missouri robbery helped show identity and was 
   admissible; no error in applying an enhancement for obstruction of justice 
   under Guidelines Sec. 3C1.1 based on the court's determination that 
   defendant perjured himself at trial and attempted to coach a witness's 
   testimony.