201511P.pdf   10/18/2021  United States  v.  Christopher Martin
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-1511
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kobes, Author, with Loken and Grasz, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. For the court's previous 
   opinion in the matter, see U.S. v. Martin, 999 F.3d 636 (8th Cir. 2021), 
   reh'g granted and opinion vacated (August 3, 2021). The police had at 
   least reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle in which defendant was 
   riding based on the information they had concerning a robbery and the 
   behavior of the car's occupants; any error in denying as moot defendant's 
   objection to evidence of a show-up was harmless after the government 
   stated it did not intend to use the evidence at trial, since the 
   government's representation dissipated any reasonable concern that the 
   evidence would be introduced, and nothing in the court's ruling prevented 
   defendant from raising the objection at trial, if necessary; Illinois 
   armed robbery qualifies as generic robbery under the enumerated offense 
   clause of Guidelines Sec. 4B1.2(a)(2), and the district court did not err 
   in imposing the career offender enhancement.