DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

202061P.pdf   08/25/2022  Mark Fochtman  v.  Hendren Plastics, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  20-2061
                          and No:  20-2068
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Arkansas Minimum Wage Act. In this class action, participants in a drug and alcohol recovery program alleged the program assigned them to work for defendant Hendren, a private company which paid the program for their services; plaintiffs alleged the defendants failed to pay them the required minimum wage; the district court concluded the plaintiffs were employees and granted them relief. Held: the state drug court judgments assigning the plaintiffs to the program did not present a Rooker-Feldman issue, and the district court had jurisdiction over the suit under the Class Action Fairness Act; the plaintiffs in the suit were the primary benefits of the unusual work and payment arrangements between the program and Hendren in that it allowed them to avoid adjudication in the criminal justice system, and the fact that the work they performed as participants in a court-ordered recovery program also benefited Hendren did not make the program participants employees of either the program or Hendren; as the plaintiffs were not employees, the district court judgment is reversed.