DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
202061P.pdf 08/25/2022 Mark Fochtman v. Hendren Plastics, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 20-2061
and No: 20-2068
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Arkansas Minimum Wage Act. In this class action, participants
in a drug and alcohol recovery program alleged the program assigned them
to work for defendant Hendren, a private company which paid the program
for their services; plaintiffs alleged the defendants failed to pay them
the required minimum wage; the district court concluded the plaintiffs
were employees and granted them relief. Held: the state drug court
judgments assigning the plaintiffs to the program did not present a
Rooker-Feldman issue, and the district court had jurisdiction over the
suit under the Class Action Fairness Act; the plaintiffs in the suit were
the primary benefits of the unusual work and payment arrangements between
the program and Hendren in that it allowed them to avoid adjudication in
the criminal justice system, and the fact that the work they performed as
participants in a court-ordered recovery program also benefited Hendren
did not make the program participants employees of either the program or
Hendren; as the plaintiffs were not employees, the district court judgment
is reversed.