DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

211299P.pdf   07/13/2022  United States  v.  Terrell Jason Armstrong
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-1299
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Western   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Officer's pre-Miranda question about defendant's employment was a standard booking question, and defendant's response was admissible; the district court did not err in admitting evidence of defendant's 2018 visit to rival drug dealers as it was relevant to defendant's actions in establishing his drug trafficking organization; nor did the court commit plain error in admitting evidence of a 2015 traffic stop as it was not plainly irrelevant to proving the existence of a later conspiracy and defendant's knowledge and intent to commit the charged offense; defendant's sentence, a downward variance, was not substantively unreasonable, and his sentence did not create an unwarranted disparity with a co-conspirator.