DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

212234P.pdf   09/22/2023  United States  v.  Christopher Stowell
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-2234
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith   
[PUBLISHED] Kobes, Author, for the Court En Banc] Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in determining that defendant's predicate offenses were committed on different occasions and could serve as the basis for sentencing defendant as an armed career criminal; the multi-day gap separating the battery offenses strongly supported a finding that defendant committed them on different occasions; even assuming that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to determine whether the offenses were committed on different occasions, the district court's error in deciding the question for itself was harmless, as no reasonable jury could find defendant committed the offenses on the same occasion, considering they occurred days apart and involved different victims. Judge Erickson, with whom Judge Kelly joins, dissenting. Judges Grasz and Judge Stras join Part B of the dissent.