DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
212234P.pdf 09/22/2023 United States v. Christopher Stowell
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-2234
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Ft. Smith
[PUBLISHED] Kobes, Author, for the Court En Banc]
Criminal case - Sentencing. The district court did not err in determining
that defendant's predicate offenses were committed on different occasions
and could serve as the basis for sentencing defendant as an armed career
criminal; the multi-day gap separating the battery offenses strongly
supported a finding that defendant committed them on different occasions;
even assuming that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to determine
whether the offenses were committed on different occasions, the district
court's error in deciding the question for itself was harmless, as no
reasonable jury could find defendant committed the offenses on the same
occasion, considering they occurred days apart and involved different
victims. Judge Erickson, with whom Judge Kelly joins, dissenting. Judges
Grasz and Judge Stras join Part B of the dissent.