DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

213243P.pdf   08/10/2022  Nani Keta  v.  Merrick Garland
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3243
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Melloy and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Petition for Review - Immigration. The agency's negative credibility finding concerning petitioner's testimony was supported by substantial evidence; absence of a Kunama interpreter did not deny petitioner due process as he was provided a Tigrinya interpreter, and petitioner repeatedly assured the IJ that he and the interpreter understood each other; a document used for impeachment of a petitioner's testimony need not be made available to the petitioner before the hearing, and the government could confront petitioner with his prior inconsistent statement; the BIA did not err in concluding that the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to support the IJ's finding that petitioner would likely be tortured; anecdotal reports of imprisonment of returnees from Sudan, and reports of torture at the prison where they were held were not sufficient to support a finding that petitioner in particular was likely to be imprisoned and tortured if returned from the U.S. to Eritrea.