DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
213487P.pdf 09/02/2022 United States v. Dennis Sryniawski
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 21-3487
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Shepherd,
Circuit Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law. When the federal cyberstalking statute - 18
U.S.C. Sec. 2261A(2)(B) - is interpreted in a way consonant with the First
Amendment, the evidence was not sufficient to support defendant's
conviction for cyberstalking; the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause
prohibits Congress from punishing political speech intended to harass or
intimidate in the broad sense of those words; for this reason, the statute
cannot be applied constitutionally to a defendant who, like this
defendant, directs speech on a matter of public concern to a political
candidate with intent merely to trouble or annoy the candidate; the
government does not maintain that the emails defendant sent contained a
true threat to the candidate or his family, and its arguments that three
categories of harassing speech are unprotected - speech integral to
criminal conduct, defamatory speech and obscenity - are not sufficient to
support the conviction given this record.