DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

213487P.pdf   09/02/2022  United States  v.  Dennis Sryniawski
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  21-3487
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Smith, Chief Judge, and Shepherd, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. When the federal cyberstalking statute - 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2261A(2)(B) - is interpreted in a way consonant with the First Amendment, the evidence was not sufficient to support defendant's conviction for cyberstalking; the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause prohibits Congress from punishing political speech intended to harass or intimidate in the broad sense of those words; for this reason, the statute cannot be applied constitutionally to a defendant who, like this defendant, directs speech on a matter of public concern to a political candidate with intent merely to trouble or annoy the candidate; the government does not maintain that the emails defendant sent contained a true threat to the candidate or his family, and its arguments that three categories of harassing speech are unprotected - speech integral to criminal conduct, defamatory speech and obscenity - are not sufficient to support the conviction given this record.