DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

223477P.pdf   12/11/2023  Armory Hospitality, LLC  v.  Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  22-3477
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota   
[PUBLISHED] [Kobes, Author, with Gruender and Stras, Circuit Judges] Civil case - COVID-19. Plaintiff had to close its business as a result of executive orders issued by Minnesota's Governor during the pandemic, and it sought to recover its business losses under the insurance policy it carried with defendant; defendant refused coverage and plaintiff brought this action. The district court did not err in dismissing the complaint on the ground that the policy provisions plaintiff relied on - building coverage clause and business income clause - did not provide coverage in the absence of direct physical loss or damage to plaintiff's property -- see Oral Surgeons, P.C. v. Cincinnati Inc. Co., 38 F.4th 4 (8th Cir. 2022) and related cases; there was no coverage under the civil authority clause in the policy because plaintiff could not show causation.