DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

002184P.pdf   08/21/2001  USA  v.  Daniel T. Sherman
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  00-2184
                          and No:  01-1271
                          and No:  00-2188
                          and No:  00-2317
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal case - criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support 
   convictions for conspiracy to distribute drugs; Apprendi challenges 
   rejected; no error in calculating drug quantities; no error in imposing 
   leadership role enhancement; failure to object to a defect in an 
   indictment is a waiver of the objection; evidence was sufficient to 
   support money laundering convictions; forfeiture of home was not 
   an excessive fine; defendant's absence during forfeiture proceeding 
   was harmless error.