DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
002188P.pdf 07/11/2002 USA v. Fortino E. Diaz
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 00-2188
and No: 01-1271
District of Minnesota
Criminal case - Sentencing Guidelines. The court en banc
unanimously holds that U.S. v. Sturgis, 238 F.3d 956 (8th Cir. 2001),
correctly states the law of the circuit that a defendant's substantial
rights are not violated where an Apprendi error can be corrected
by running sentences consecutively under Guideline Section
5G1.2(d); to the extent two previous cases held the section is
discretionary and that a remand is necessary even where the
Apprendi violation can be cured by running sentences
consecutively, they are overruled; panel opinion and judgment
affirming convictions and sentences reinstated.