022444P.pdf   08/19/2005  ACLU NE Foundation  v.  City of Plattsmouth
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  02-2444
   District of Nebraska   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bowman, Author, for the Court En Banc] 
   Civil case - Constitutional law. Like the Ten Commandments 
   monument in Van Orden v. Perry, 125 S.Ct. 2854 (2005), the Plattsmouth 
   monument makes passive - and permissible - use of the text of the Ten 
   Commandments to acknowledge the role of religion in our nation's 
   heritage, and the district court's judgment in favor of the ACLU is 
   reversed. Judge Bye, joined by J. Morris S. Arnold, dissenting. 
  
022444P.pdf   02/18/2004  ACLU NE Foundation  v.  City of Plattsmouth
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  02-2444
   District of Nebraska   
   Civil case - Constitutional Law. Doe plaintiff and the ACLU both had
   standing to challenge the City's display of a Ten Commandments
   monument in a local city park; applying the Lemon test, the public
   display of the monument violates the Establishment clause of the First
   Amendment, as the City had a solely religious purpose for installing or
   maintaining the monument, and the primary effect of the display was to
   advance the Judeo-Christian religion. Judge Richard S. Arnold,
   concurring. Judge Pasco Bowman, concurring in part (on standing) and
   dissenting in part (on application of the Lemon test).
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author]