022894P.pdf   09/01/2004  Coca-Cola Company  v.  William S. Purdy
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  02-2894
                          and No:  03-1929
                          and No:  03-1795
                          and No:  03-1795
   District of Minnesota   
   Civil Case - Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act. District court 
   did not abuse its discretion in granting permanent injunctive relief to 
   trademark holders against registerer of domain names that are identical or 
   confusingly similar to the mark and in finding bad faith intent to profit 
   under the ACPA. First Amendment does not protect use of mark in 
   domain name to attract unwitting and unwilling audience to message of 
   domain name holder, and domain name holder lacked reasonable grounds 
   to believe his conduct was lawful and entitled to safe harbor provision. 
   Preliminary injunction did not constitute prior restraint, and was neither 
   impermissibly vague nor overbroad. Appeal from contempt orders are 
   dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, as they are nonappealable interlocutory 
   orders. [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Smith and Colloton, 
   Circuit Judges]