023124P.pdf   07/18/2003  USA  v.  Rogelio Preciado
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  02-3124
                          and No:  02-3431
                          and No:  02-3533
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal Case- criminal law. District court did not clearly err 
   in granting two, rather than three, level reduction for acceptance 
   of responsibility for defendant who pleaded guilty after first day 
   of trial. Denial of minor-role reduction for codefendant was not 
   clear error. District court did not abuse its discretion in denying 
   motion for continuance to depose witness. A photo lineup was 
   not unduly suggestive and did not improperly taint the in-court 
   identification. District court did not abuse its discretion in 
   permitting codefendants to assert their privilege against self 
   incrimination at codefendants trial. District court did not err in 
   denying an evidentiary hearing as to one codefendant's 
   testimony exonerating another codefendant. Dissent in part 
   by Judge Bright.