023220P.pdf   11/14/2003  Brian Arthur Hill  v.  Patrick Scott
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  02-3220
   District of Minnesota   
   Civil case - civil rights. Officer was entitled to qualified immunity as he 
   had sufficient identifying information to reasonably conclude that a 
   warrant existed for Hill's arrest, and no reasonable officer would have 
   known that failing to investigate further would violate the Fourth 
   Amendment; arresting officers did not violate Hill's constitutional rights 
   when they refused to release him after it was determined there was no 
   warrant for his arrest, as they had separate, independent basis for 
   detaining him; defendants were entitled to summary judgment on state 
   law claims for false arrest and intentional infliction of emotional distress 
   were. Dissent by Judge Heaney on the issue of qualified immunity.