DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

023393P.pdf   08/13/2003  Sherry Anderson  v.  Raymond Corp.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  02-3393
   Eastern District of Arkansas   
   Civil case - torts. District court did not err in striking plaintiff's 
   proposed expert's testimony regarding stand-uplift truck design, 
   as the witness admitted he was not an expert in the design or 
   engineering of stand-up lift trucks and had never seen such a 
   device before this case; district court did not abuse its 
   discretion in striking plaintiff's proposed replacement expert 
   as plaintiff did not comply with the district court's order 
   regarding the naming of a replacement; in the absence of 
   any expert testimony on defective design, the district court 
   did not err in granting manufacturer's motion for summary 
   judgment on plaintiff's strict liability claim.