DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

031411P.pdf   05/21/2004  Smithfield Foods  v.  Thomas Miller
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-1411
   Southern District of Iowa   
Civil case - Constitutional law. Question of whether Iowa Code Section 9H.2 regulating pork and beef processors' activities violates the dormant Commerce Clause was not mooted by 2003 amendment to the section; however, the court could not determine whether the new amendment possessed a discriminatory purpose or discriminatory effect on interstate commerce; the cases is remanded to permit the district court to determine whether the new section unconstitutionally discriminates against interstate commerce; if the district court concludes the discrimination is only incidental, the court must determine whether the burden imposed on commerce is clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits. [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author]