DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

031689P.pdf   01/28/2004  United States  v.  Ashland, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-1689
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal case - criminal law. District court erred in imposing probation 
   conditions which related to third party's operation of a refinery formerly 
   owned by defendant; the conditions violated defendant's due process 
   rights by making its probation contingent on future acts or omissions of 
   the third party; appellate court may excise objectionable conditions when 
   they are a minor part of the conditions of probation and not integral to the 
   district court's judgment. [PUBLISHED]