032451P.pdf   02/16/2005  United States  v.  Gary Lee Wipf
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-2451
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal case - criminal law. Since the child victims in this case 
   testified, admission of their statements to a psychologist did not violate 
   defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights; even the 
   psychologist's testimony was inadmissible hearsay, it was merely 
   cumulative evidence and any error in its admission was harmless; district 
   court did not abuse its discretion in limiting defendant's cross- 
   examination of one of the victims as the questioning touched on 
   unsupported allegations; there was sufficient attenuation between any 
   illegality in a search and the testimony of a victim identified by some of 
   the seized materials so that the witness's testimony was admissible; 
   defendant's admissions were not in response to custodial interrogation 
   and were admissible; Sixth Amendment does not require jurors to be 
   summoned from a particular division of the district. 
   [PUBLISHED][ Smith, Author, with M. Arnold and Gibson, Circuit 
   Judges]