DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

032652P.pdf   08/08/2005  Diesel Machinery  v.  B.R. Lee Industries
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-2652
                          and No:  04-1577
   District of South Dakota   
[PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with J. Gibson and Gruender, Circuit Judges] Civil case- Franchise law. Plaintiff was a dealer within the meaning of South Dakota Dealer Protection Act, and the Act applied to the franchise agreement between the parties; district court did not err in granting summary judgment for plaintiff on the question of whether defendant violated the Act by unfairly terminating its franchise; district court did not err in denying defendant's motion for JAML based on its claim that plaintiff failed to mitigate damages by accepting offer of reinstatement, as the jury was properly instructed and its decision that plaintiff did not act unreasonably in rejecting the offer was supported by sufficient evidence; defendant's evidentiary claims rejected; district court did not err in submitting punitive damages issue to the jury as there was clear and convincing evidence showing a reasonable basis to believe there had been willful, wanton or malicious misconduct; remitted $2.6 million punitive damage award did not violate constitutional limits.