032688P.pdf   05/27/2005  United States  v.  George Edward Dobbs
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-2688
                          and No:  03-2762
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal Case - sentencing. On remand from United States Supreme 
   Court, sentence is reviewed in light of United States v. Booker. No Sixth 
   Amendment violation exists because district court did not make 
   prohibited findings. Defendant's sentence is reviewed for plain error and 
   none exists because there is no affirmative indication that sentencing 
   judge would have imposed a more lenient sentence if the judge had 
   understood guidelines to be advisory. Claims challenging whether verdict 
   was supported by substantial evidence are rejected for the reasons stated 
   in the prior opinion. 
   PUBLISHED] [Bright, Author, with Chief Judge Loken and Smith, Circuit Judges] 
  
032688U.pdf   08/02/2004  United States  v.  George Edward Dobbs
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-2688
                          and No:  03-2762
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal case - Criminal case. Evidence was sufficient to support mail 
   fraud convictions. 
   [UNPUBLISHED] [Bright, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and 
   Smith, Circuit Judge]