032795P.pdf   07/02/2004  Beverly Liszewski  v.  Target Corp.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-2795
   Eastern District of Missouri   
   Civil case - torts. In a case involving claims defendant failed to 
   adequately protect plaintiff from attack by an unknown third party, 
   district court did not err in finding that the prior criminal acts at the 
   store were insufficient to place defendant on notice that it was necessary to 
   protect its business invitees from attack by unknown third parties; 
   defendant's decision to provide security cameras and guards at the store 
   was not an admission that a foreseeable risk existed, because under 
   Missouri law, a defendant's decision to exercise greater prudence than the 
   law otherwise requires is not a basis for imposing a duty. 
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Bright and Hansen, Circuit Judges]