DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

032859P.pdf   07/30/2004  USA  v.  Anthony Lucca
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-2859
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal case - criminal law. Officer's testimony at suppression 
   hearing was not internally inconsistent, nor did it lead to an inference the 
   officer had falsified the information presented to the judge issuing the 
   warrant in the case, and the district court did not err in denying 
   defendant's request for a Franks hearing; claim that newly discovered 
   evidence should result in a remand for a Franks hearing rejected, as the 
   newly discovered evidence did not amount to a substantial preliminary 
   showing of intentional or reckless falsehoods by the officer; search 
   warrant was supported by probable cause; facts sufficient to support drug 
   quantity calculation were admitted by defendant as part of his guilty plea, 
   and no additional finding is required under Apprendi or Blakely in order 
   to justify the sentence imposed. 
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Murphy and Smith, Circuit Judges]