DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

033115P.pdf   09/13/2004  City of Marshall  v.  Heartland Consumers
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-3115
   District of Minnesota   
   Civil case - contracts. Settlement agreement gave defendant the 
   unilateral right to change the funding levels for settlement funds, and its 
   actions in changing the amount of budgeted reserves, thereby reducing 
   the amount of money available to pay customer refunds, were 
   permissible, and the district court erred in finding Heartland violated the 
   settlement agreement when it changed the levels. 
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and Bright, 
   Circuit Judge]