DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

033336P.pdf   08/11/2004  United States  v.  Michael S. Czichray
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-3336
   District of Minnesota   
   Criminal case - criminal law. District court erred in holding that 
   defendant's statement was the product of custodial interrogation 
   conducted without Miranda protections and had to be suppressed; looking 
   at the totality of the circumstances, court could not say defendant was in 
   custody when he was interviewed in his home, was told several times of 
   his right to terminate the interview at will, and was not subjected to the 
   types of restraints on freedom of movement associated with a formal 
   arrest. Dissent by Judge Morris S. Arnold. 
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman, and M. Arnold, Circuit Judges]