DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

033364P.pdf   02/02/2005  United States  v.  Jaime Bustos-Torres
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  03-3364
                          and No:  03-3365
   District of Minnesota   
Criminal case - criminal law. Arresting officer had reasonable grounds for conducting a Terry stop after observing what he believed to be drug deals; officer had a grounds to conduct a pat down search and could seize a wad of cash he touched in defendant's pocket as there was probable cause to believe it was the evidence of drug dealing; officer had probable cause to make arrest after finding the cash; co-defendant's absence from trial did not prejudice defendant; testimony that defendant solicited a witness to deal drugs was properly admitted; evidence was sufficient to establish conspiracy and aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute; extraneous comment by court that seized meth would not be sent back to the jury room because of its bad smell was inadvertent and did not seriously affect the fairness and integrity of the trial process; district court did not err in denying motion for a role-reduction. [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Wollman and Hamilton, Circuit Judges]