DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
033914P.pdf 12/13/2004 Dairy Farmers v. Travelers Ins. Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 03-3914
Western District of Missouri
Civil case - insurance. District court did not abuse its discretion in
refusing to instruct the jury on the additional breach of fiduciary duty
claims requested by plaintiff, as the district court's decision was
reasonable and consistent with this court's first opinion in the case;
further, the additional claims were not supported by admissible proof;
district court did not err in refusing to submit plaintiff's special
verdicts; district court did not err in refusing to submit plaintiff's
damages theory instruction as the instructions which were given were an
accurate statement of Missouri law and the proposed damage instruction was
without legal authority; claim that the jury verdict was inconsistent was
waived by plaintiff's failure to object before judgment was entered; even
if the argument was not waived, a finding of liability combined with a
refusal to award damages does not constitute an inconsistent verdict,
especially in light of plaintiff's reliance on speculative damage evidence
and a legally-unsupported theory of damages.
[PUBLISHED] Riley, Author, with Lay and Smith, Circuit Judges]