041038P.pdf   08/08/2005  United States  v.  Olusoji Agboola
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-1038
                          and No:  04-2223
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and Smith, 
   Circuit Judge] 
   Criminal case - criminal law. Claims of ineffective assistance of 
   counsel were not fully developed enough to permit review on direct 
   appeal and would have to be raised in a Section 2255; district court did 
   not err in admitting investigating agent's testimony at the sentencing 
   hearing and, to the extent the testimony contained hearsay, the whole of 
   the agent's testimony provided sufficient indicia of reliability to permit its 
   consideration; district court did not err in grouping money laundering 
   counts under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1956(a)(1)(A) and (B); applying Pirani's 
   plain error analysis, defendant was not entitled to Booker relief as the 
   record does not demonstrate that the district court would have imposed a 
   lesser sentence under an advisory guidelines scheme; district court did not 
   err in imposing an enhancement for obstruction of justice based on 
   defendant's efforts to hinder the investigation of his crimes; district court 
   did not err in calculating the amount of loss caused by defendant's fraud; 
   district court's order requiring defendant to satisfy certain mortgages was 
   analogous to restitution and the court did not err in voiding defendant's 
   fraudulently obtained interest in the mortgages.