DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

041643P.pdf   08/19/2005  Douglas Co.  v.  Commercial Natl.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-1643
                          and No:  04-2203
   Western District of Arkansas   
[PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Wollman and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Civil case - contracts. Suit against bank for breach of contract and negligence was not barred by the parties' account agreement, as the agreement's provision requiring the account holder to give the bank notice within 60 days applied to forgeries and alterations and did not apply to encoding errors made by the bank; whether the account holder acted reasonably in bringing the matter to the bank's attention was properly submitted to the jury; evidence was sufficient to support jury verdict for the account holder on the claims that bank's error was negligent; instructions were properly based on the elements of negligence and the exercise of ordinary care; district court did not err in awarding attorneys' fees based on Ark. Code Ann. Sec. 16-22-308; no error in awarding prejudgment interest as the amount of the claim was readily ascertainable.