DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

041884P.pdf   08/18/2005  Charleston Housing  v.  USDA
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-1884
                          and No:  04-2620
   Eastern District of Missouri   
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Murphy and Bright, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Public Housing. The Section 515 contract between the Housing Authority and HUD was subject to the payment protocols established in the Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act and any attempt to prepay the loan covering the housing units in question had to comply with the protocols; questions concerning whether the housing authority's plans to close and demolish the housing was not moot; district court did not err in finding that the tenants in the housing had established a prima facie case that closing the units would have a disparate impact on minorities; housing authority failed to demonstrate that its proposed actions had a manifest relationship to legitimate non-discriminatory policy objectives and was justifiable on the ground it was necessary to achieve those objectives; case remanded for further proceedings on the nature of the relief to be granted.