DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

041972P.pdf   07/06/2005  United States  v.  S. Killingsworth
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-1972
                          and No:  04-1973
   District of Minnesota   
[PUBLISHED] [M. Arnold , Author, with Loken, Chief Judge, and Riley, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Sentencing Guidelines. District court had sufficient evidence to support its findings concerning defendant Killingsworth's other relevant conduct; applying Pirani's plain error analysis, defendant Killingsworth was not entitled to Booker relief as he could not demonstrate a reasonable probability the district court would have sentenced him to a lesser sentence absent the Booker error; fact that he was exposed to judicial fact-finding concerning drug quantity did not invalidate defendant Williams's guilty plea; district court did not err in imposing obstruction-of-justice enhancement against Williams, nor did the court err in denying his request for a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility; defendant Williams was entitled to Booker relief based on the district court's sentencing comments which indicated the court felt its hands were tied by the mandatory guidelines scheme.