DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

041995P.pdf   05/02/2005  USA  v.  Arend Mathijssen
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-1995
   District of Nebraska   
Criminal case - Sentencing Guidelines. The unreasonableness standard articulated in Booker applies only to the district court's determination of the appropriate ultimate sentence to impose based on all the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3553(a), not to the district court's interpretation of the meaning and applicability of the guidelines themselves; here, because defendant has alleged only that the district court improperly applied the guidelines, and has not raised any general challenge to his sentence based on the Supreme Court's recent decisions, the court would apply de novo review and would not reach the issue of reasonableness; the district court did not err in imposing an enhancement for possession of a dangerous weapon in connection with the drug offense; nor did the court err when it increased defendant's sentence based on its finding that he was a career offender. [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Magill and Colloton, Circuit Judges]