DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

043090P.pdf   11/07/2005  Raymond Day  v.  Case Credit Corp.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-3090
   Eastern District of Arkansas   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Murphy and Smith, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - contracts. District court did not err in concluding that
   dealer was not acting as Case's agent when he negotiated lease
   agreements; however, the district court erred in finding Case could
   enforce either the oral contracts the dealer entered into or the forged
   purchase agreements he submitted because Case was not the assignee of
   the oral agreements and the forged agreements are unenforceable; nor can
   Case enforce the agreements as a third-party beneficiary; on remand the
   district court should consider whether Case's alleged misconduct should
   also preclude recovery on an unjust enrichment theory.