DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

043428P.pdf   11/15/2005  Royce Young  v.  Pollock Engineering
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-3428
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Lay and Fagg, Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - diversity product liability. Grant of summary judgment to
   die changer manufacturer on defective-design claim is reversed, as
   testimony was presented that die changer was defective and unreasonably
   dangerous and a safety design modification was available. The district
   court erred in concluding the manufacturer is not responsible for
   providing safety safeguards. The district court correctly granted summary
   judgment on duty-to-warn claim. Judge Lay dissents on the duty-to-warn
   claim.