DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

043629P.pdf   02/15/2006  Friends of the  v.  Conservationists
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-3629
                          and No:  04-3632
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, Heaney and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - environmental law. The Forest Service had authority to recalculate the base period motorboat use of the Boundary Waters Canoe Act Wilderness to include uses previously excluded as the result of a significant legal error which was only made apparent to the Forest Service by this court's opinion in Friends of the Boundary Wasters Wilderness v. Dombeck, 164 F.3d 1115 (8th Cir. 1999); Forest Service recalculated the Moose Lake Chain base period in an arbitrary and capricious manner, as the survey used to support the recalculation was flawed and was performed in a manner which made the results unreliable; similarly, the Forest Service's recalculation of the the Saganaga Lake Chain and Farm Lake Chain base periods were also performed in an arbitrary and capricious manner; matter remanded with directions to remand the matter to the Forest Service for a recalculation of the base period use and motorboat quotas consistent with the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act and this opinion.