DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
043629P.pdf 02/15/2006 Friends of the v. Conservationists
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 04-3629
and No: 04-3632
District of Minnesota
[PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, Heaney and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - environmental law. The Forest Service had authority to
recalculate the base period motorboat use of the Boundary Waters Canoe
Act Wilderness to include uses previously excluded as the result of a
significant legal error which was only made apparent to the Forest
Service by this court's opinion in Friends of the Boundary Wasters
Wilderness v. Dombeck, 164 F.3d 1115 (8th Cir. 1999); Forest Service
recalculated the Moose Lake Chain base period in an arbitrary and
capricious manner, as the survey used to support the recalculation was
flawed and was performed in a manner which made the results unreliable;
similarly, the Forest Service's recalculation of the the Saganaga Lake
Chain and Farm Lake Chain base periods were also performed in an
arbitrary and capricious manner; matter remanded with directions to
remand the matter to the Forest Service for a recalculation of the base
period use and motorboat quotas consistent with the Boundary Waters
Canoe Area Wilderness Act and this opinion.