043666P.pdf   06/06/2006  United States  v.  Dean Little Hawk
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-3666
   District of South Dakota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Murphy and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal case -Sentencing. District court did not err in denying
   defendant credit for acceptance of responsibility under Guidelines Sec.
   3E1.1 as defendant did not accept full responsibility for all of his
   conduct; sentence in excess of the Guidelines range was not unreasonable
   in light of the heinous nature of defendant's conduct; the record
   demonstrated the court followed the applicable law in setting sentence
   and was not improperly influenced by emotion; failure to include
   statement of reasons as part of the judgment and commitment order did
   not require reversal as the sentence was reasonable.