DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
044184P.pdf 05/18/2006 Gerald M. Dunne v. Peter E. Libbra
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 04-4184
Eastern District of Missouri
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with McMillian and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Fraud. Although plaintiff's claim that the district court
erred in its burden of proof instruction was not preserved, the claim fails
on the merits, as the Missouri Supreme Court has repeatedly held that the
standard of proof for fraud is preponderance of the evidence, and that is
the standard contained in the district court's instruction; defendant
produced sufficient evidence to permit the jury to find plaintiff acted with
fraudulent intent; district court's ex parte communication with the jury
and failure to give counsel an opportunity to object to the response does
not require reversal if substantive rights were not adversely affected; here,
it is highly improbable that a different verdict would have resulted, and
the district court did not err in denying plaintiff's motion for new trial;
district court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiff's post-
verdict motion to amend his pleadings to add a Missouri Blue Sky Law
claim.