DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
046070P.pdf 12/16/2004 Darwin Franzen v. Corn-Pro Nonstock
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 04-6070
and No: 04-6072
and No: 04-6071
District of Nebraska
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Bankruptcy court did not err in
determining Corn-Pro was a farmer for purposes of Section 303(a) of the
Code and thus could not be forced into involuntary bankruptcy; the
record supported the court's conclusion that Corn-Pro was engaged in
farming and that it obtained all of its income from its farming operations;
district court did not err in denying Corn-Pro's request for attorneys' fees
and costs; under Eighth Circuit precedent, an award of fees and costs is
not required in all cases when a petition is dismissed, and the bankruptcy
court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, based on its
findings that the question was close and that there was no evidence the
moving creditors acted in bad faith.
[PUBLISHED] [Federman, Author, with Kressel and Schermer, Bankruptcy Judges]