DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

046070P.pdf   12/16/2004  Darwin Franzen  v.  Corn-Pro Nonstock
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  04-6070
                          and No:  04-6072
                          and No:  04-6071
   District of Nebraska   
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel. Bankruptcy court did not err in determining Corn-Pro was a farmer for purposes of Section 303(a) of the Code and thus could not be forced into involuntary bankruptcy; the record supported the court's conclusion that Corn-Pro was engaged in farming and that it obtained all of its income from its farming operations; district court did not err in denying Corn-Pro's request for attorneys' fees and costs; under Eighth Circuit precedent, an award of fees and costs is not required in all cases when a petition is dismissed, and the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, based on its findings that the question was close and that there was no evidence the moving creditors acted in bad faith. [PUBLISHED] [Federman, Author, with Kressel and Schermer, Bankruptcy Judges]