DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

051082P.pdf   03/16/2006  School Bd ISD No. 11  v.  Joshua Renollett
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  05-1082
   District of Minnesota   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Fagg and Melloy, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Any
   irregularities relating to student's written behavior intervention plan did
   not deny him a free appropriate public educations (FAPE); district's
   response plan for behavioral incidents did not qualify as conditional
   procedures under Minnesota law, and the school district did not violate
   state law or the IDEA when it instituted the procedures; school district
   provided student with a meaningful educational benefit and did not
   violate the Act.